Christopher Six
  • Home
  • About
  • Music

Fear of Schultz exposes Democrats’ problem

1/31/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
By now we’ve all heard it, billionaire Howard Schultz is toying with the idea of running as an independent for president.

You know this by the handwringing, kicking and screaming coming from Democrats. He’s going to split the vote, and guarantee Donald Trump a second term, they fear.

But instead of taking a good, hard look at themselves, and examining how that is possible, they’d rather try to push him out of the race.

Why do they fear him? Because he is a centrist. Because he doesn’t subscribe to the hard-left turn the party has decided to take heading into 2020.

It seems many Democrats have decided the best way to defeat Trump is to offer a free lunch. They realize that is unappetizing to the centrists in their party, but those folks will swallow the bitter pill of socialism, and whatever candidate the party throws their way, just to get him out of the Oval Office.

You’ve got to admit, it’s sounds like a pretty good strategy. Hold the majority of the party hostage to get your way. Anybody but Trump in 2020. A Howard Schultz throws a monkey wrench into that plan.

Why?

Because he asks, “how will you pay for it?” He points out there is no such thing as a free ride. He questions the 70 percent tax rate. He’s the worst of all possibilities: socially liberal, but fiscally conservative. He doesn’t think “billionaire” is a dirty word, and reminds centrists that maybe “socialism” is. He gives them an alternative.

And so declared and undeclared candidates, and willing pundits who do their work for them, come out of the woodwork to tear him down. To remind everyone that independents can’t win, that Starbucks is evil (while they slowly hide their grande latte behind their back), that Bloomberg crunched the numbers and proved them right.

Yeah, OK, I get it. He has a lot of money, and he’s done some things that get people really mad. But, he says some interesting stuff and if he can move the conversation, I’m all for his exploration of a run. In the end, he may prove to be a paper tiger, but I am desperate for an alternative to the status quo. Few things have been as detrimental to our nation as the two party duopoly, and that goes back to the founders.

Democrats and Republicans may not agree on much, but they certainly agree on preserving their own “phony-baloney jobs,” to borrow from Blazing Saddles’ Gov. Lepetomane. That’s why they collude on who gets on the debate stage and limit ballot access.

Oh, and did I mention the dark money? What’s that, you ask? Dark money is money spent on political causes by groups that are not required by law to disclose their donors. $150 million in dark money was spent on the 2018 midterm elections, according to an analysis from Issue One. Fifty-four percent of that was from liberal groups, I might add. Thirty-one percent came from conservative groups, while just 15 percent came from bipartisan or nonpartisan groups.

And the media gleefully play into it. Desperate for a gotcha “Aleppo moment” like the one used to derail the Libertarian Party’s Gary Johnson last go-round, “Morning Joe’s” Mika Brzezinski asked Schultz how much a box of Cheerios cost to prove he was “out of touch.” You know what Mika? I have no idea either. I don’t eat breakfast.

Something needs to change. Pie in the sky? I’d like to think a guy with that much cash could break the duopoly, but I’m also a realist. Third party and independent runs have been largely unsuccessful. Unless someone can challenge the constitutionality of the bi-partisan Commission On Presidential Debates or ballot access rules, little will change. Third parties and independents will be marginalized. They won’t get the money. You can’t fight city hall.

But, maybe you can force some reality on the parties. Particularly, in this case, on the Democrats. I still adamantly believe you cannot win by playing to the base, and unfortunately, that is the Democrats’ strategy here. You have to make a play for the voter in the middle. Those voters swung to Trump in 2016, largely because of the unappealing qualities of the candidate the Democrats nominated.

Republicans recognized that. Thus, they swallowed the bitter Trump pill, because they saw their path to victory and an opportunity to get what they wanted. Control over the judiciary.

Democrats have misread that. Rather than see support for her primary opponent as “anyone but Clinton,” they have embraced his ideology as a path to success.

That, more than anything, will lead to their failure in 2020. If a Howard Schultz exposes that, more power to him. If Democrats truly want to derail a Schultz movement, they have to make a play for the center. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez may be a lot of fun, but she is not going to win a national election.

A Schultz run will no more hand the presidency to Trump than Stein or Johnson did. Thirty-four percent approval rating? If you can’t beat those odds, you only have one place to point the finger.

Bill Clinton and Barack Obama did not win by playing to the extremes. A lot of people held their noses and voted for Trump. Find someone they would rather vote for.

You want to beat Trump? Appeal to the center. Build a better mousetrap, or in this case, find a better candidate.
0 Comments

Quick hit: It’s cold out

1/30/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
How cold is it?

It’s so cold, news outlets are leading with global warming and deniers are responding with “where’s your global warming now?”

Here’s the deal. It is flipping cold out. So much so that we can change the motto to “nothing stops the U.S. Mail except crippling cold.”

That doesn’t mean folks should be pointing to snowballs ala Sen. Jim Inhofe to prove climate change is a hoax. Weather is not climate change, it is a symptom of it.

Here are just three examples to consider when you question the validity of climate change:
​
  1. The U.S. military has been studying climate change as a national security issue for several years, including the effects on bases and strategies in a rapidly changing arctic region where world powers are scrambling for an advantage. They can’t afford to wait out the politics, they deal in reality.
  2. Nowhere is climate change more evident than in the dangers posed to Alaskan fishing villages, as rising waters threaten their very existence. "Climate change is not just an environmental issue. It is also a social, cultural, and economic issue important to all Alaskans. As a result of this warming, coastal erosion, thawing permafrost, retreating sea ice, record forest fires, and other changes are affecting, and will continue to affect, the lifestyles and livelihoods of Alaskans," so reads a 2007 executive order signed by then Gov. Sarah Palin, a couple of years before it became politically expedient to take an opposing tack.
  3. The U.S. government’s National Climate Assessment, released late last year, found that climate change was likely to “increasingly disrupt” American farming with conditions that will be harder on livestock and crops. And this isn’t conjecture. A recent study found climate change in Michigan has led to warmer, drier growing seasons, stunting the growth of sugar maples. The result is a syrup shortage is well in the cards in our future. Think about the impact of the maple syrup industry in the northeast, and how that will change the economy.

This isn’t an Al Gore documentary, this is fact, happening as we speak. Who cares about the cause — if it is man, or just some natural thing that happens as some would claim—you can debate it all the live-long day for all I care. This is reality, not conjecture, and we need to figure out how to deal with it.

It’s not all doom and gloom. The Economist reports that despite withdrawal from the Paris Agreement of 2017, taxes on imported solar panels, and elimination of subsidies for solar and wind, American companies are leading the way when it comes to reducing carbon emissions. Here’s to the free market doing what our lawmakers seem to be incapable of.

What we choose to do — or not — will have profound lasting effects on our economy, security and food supply. Some think it’s easier to bury their heads in the sand and dump this on the lap of future generations.
​

That is dereliction of duty.
0 Comments

Quick hit: Viral video

1/23/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
There’s been a lot of talk about who to blame for the altercation shown in the viral video taken at the Lincoln Memorial last weekend in which a young catholic student and a Native American demonstrator faced off.

I’m going to have trouble believing you if you say you didn’t rush to judgement based on preconceived notions — one way or another — when you saw it. I’ll own it. I did. I saw a smug young man. After all, I knew that face. I was that smug young activist a few years back.

And that’s where I go in this “who to blame” argument. I blame all of them. Anyone who has ever been in a flashpoint situation like that would likely say the same. Tensions and emotions are running high. Adrenaline is flowing. Things are being said and done without thought.

The Washington Post in its reporting said “a group of half a dozen Hebrew Israelites had, in fact, been goading and preaching at both the Native Americans and high schoolers, using profanity and highly provocative language, for nearly an hour.”

Really? At kids? And where were the chaperones? Why weren’t these kids removed from that situation? And what was the reasoning behind stepping in between? We’ve been all over the field on that one.

The most reasonable explanation for all is “the fog of war.” What happened was ugly. It escalated quickly. It was unfortunate. It was not unique. A good many wrong decisions were made, and no one comes out of it smelling like roses.

Our attempts to vilify one group and deify another — based either on politics, religion or skin color — are an unseemly search for validation of our own personal beliefs. We need to be better than that.
0 Comments
<<Previous
    Picture

      Interested in adding my column to your newspaper, website or publication? Drop me a line to discuss rates.

    Submit

    Archives

    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    September 2017
    August 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    blog
    blog
    News Blog Directory
    Best Personal Blogs About Life - OnToplist.com
    RSS Search
    Blogging Fusion Blog Directory
    Blogs Directory
    Scoop.it
Proudly powered by Weebly